{"id":739,"date":"2014-12-02T06:45:33","date_gmt":"2014-12-02T06:45:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.youthfacts.org\/?page_id=739"},"modified":"2014-12-02T06:45:33","modified_gmt":"2014-12-02T06:45:33","slug":"lead-exposure-and-poverty-have-we-gotten-youth-violence-all-wrong","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.youthfacts.org\/?page_id=739","title":{"rendered":"Lead exposure and poverty: Have we gotten \u201cyouth violence\u201d all wrong?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>Lead exposure and poverty: Have we gotten \u201cyouth violence\u201d all wrong?<\/h3>\n<h4>December 20, 2012<\/h4>\n<p>CJCJ authors have published several provocative <a href=\"http:\/\/jar.sagepub.com\/content\/25\/1\/48.abstract\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">studies<\/span><\/a> documenting that <a href=\"http:\/\/youthfacts.org\/files\/Does_age.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">teenagers and young adults are no more prone to risk-taking and crime<\/span><\/a> than older adults <strong>once the fact 15-24 year-olds are 2-3 times more likely to suffer the economic and environmental harms associated with poverty <\/strong>than middle-agers is taken into account.<\/p>\n<p>We find terms like \u201cadolescent risk taking\u201d and \u201cyouth violence\u201d are misnomers; rather, there are generally elevated risks that accompany worsening socioeconomic disadvantage that carry known physiological risks (the one discussed here is lead poisoning). The <strong><em>few<\/em><\/strong> middle-agers who suffer poverty rates of 15-19%\u2014the <strong><em>average<\/em><\/strong> poverty level of teenagers\u2014display murder, violent, felony, and other crime rates equivalent to teenagers of similar socioeconomic status.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s infuriating that modern authorities continue repeating the same mistake\u2014failure to incorporate differences in economic and environmental conditions\u2014concerning crime by young people that their discredited 19<sup>th<\/sup> century forbears did regarding crime by race. That despite the fact that most agree <strong>poorer populations have higher rates of arrest and crime outcomes than richer ones<\/strong>, a reality well documented when comparing crime rates by race or locale\u2014but, astonishingly, never before researched when comparing younger-age to older-age crime.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly often ignored research by economic consultant <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ricknevin.com\/uploads\/The_Answer_is_Lead_Poisoning.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Rick Nevin<\/span><\/a> suggests <strong>another factor co-occurring with low socioeconomic status that appears highly predictive of crime: lead poisoning<\/strong>. As detailed in <a href=\"http:\/\/youthfacts.org\/post\/public\/policy\/lead\/and\/criminality\/epa\/america\/s\/top\/crime\/buster\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">our previous blog<\/span><\/a>, blood lead levels more closely track crime rates and trends by generation and race than any other factor we can find. Whether that means lead toxicity is a direct cause\u2014which it appears to be\u2014or is the best representative of a family of risk factors associated with poverty demands intensive analysis.<\/p>\n<p>Further, the <strong>physiological effects of lead are strikingly similar to those in-vogue biodevelopmental authorities claim are innate to the \u201cteenage brain\u201d <\/strong>(and that their forebears pronounced innate to \u201clower races\u201d such as African and Native Americans and to women). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lead.org.au\/fs\/fst28.html\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Medical studies<\/span><\/a> associate lead toxicity with under-developed prefrontal cortexes in the brain, lowered intelligence, reduced higher-order \u201cexecutive\u201d reasoning, lack of impulse control, greater distractibility, short attention span (hyperactivity), and difficulty regulating behavior.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTeenage brain\u201d authorities brandish the higher arrest, violent crime, and other risk statistics of adolescents compared to older adults and, reasoning backwards, posit that any differences found in neuroimagings of teenage versus adult brains (even though small and inconsistent) provide <strong>the<\/strong> biological \u201cexplanation\u201d for \u201cadolescent risk taking.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>However, adolescent risk statistics are defined and greatly boosted by very high rates among African American and moderately high rates among Latino and similarly low-income youth. More affluent youth, despite possessing teenage brains, don\u2019t display elevated risk-taking\u2014in fact, they\u2019re among the safest, least risky populations of all.<\/p>\n<p>The faulty interpretation of \u201cadolescent risk\u2019 statistics and biodevelopmental theory is troublesome not simply because it fails to recognize that adolescents generally are poorer than adults, but because poorer children suffer higher levels of environmental toxins such as lead in their systems due to greater exposure to lead-based paint in older housing and to pre-1990 leaded gasoline emissions concentrated in central cities. African American children\u2019s lead levels have been 2-5 times higher than for other races\u2019, with Latino children a distant second and White and Asian children the lowest.<\/p>\n<p>Potentially, then, blood-lead toxicity should play a large role in interpreting the widely varying crime rates by population group and over time. If the real culprits in \u201ccrime proneness\u201d among individuals who display these traits are features associated with concentrated poverty, one (and perhaps the most important) of which is greater exposure to an environmental toxin with measured harmful effects, then lead levels should be added to general socioeconomic status as a key factor in analyzing crime.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lead exposure and poverty: Have we gotten \u201cyouth violence\u201d all wrong? December 20, 2012 CJCJ authors have published several provocative studies documenting that teenagers and young adults are no more prone to risk-taking and crime than older adults once the fact 15-24 year-olds are 2-3 times more likely to suffer the economic and environmental harms [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-739","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.youthfacts.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/739","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.youthfacts.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.youthfacts.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.youthfacts.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.youthfacts.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=739"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.youthfacts.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/739\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":740,"href":"https:\/\/www.youthfacts.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/739\/revisions\/740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.youthfacts.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}