Girl Myths                                                                                                updated 26 June 2007

Are girls today are more depressed, alienated, fearful, mean, and materialistic?

 

Are girls are more addicted, using alcohol, tobacco, and dangerous drugs at younger ages?

 

Are girls are suffering more body image problems, getting more cosmetic surgery, and taking greater risks with sex at younger ages?

 

Are girls are more violent and criminal today?

 

Are girls today are more in danger of violence, especially sexual violence, than previous generations?

 

Are younger women are more traditional and apathetic, reversing decades of feminist gains by older generations?

 

NO to all the above. What is it about teenage girls that terrifies Americans into gibbering lunacy?

 

And not just threatened male traditionalists or 1980s evangelical women organized against the Equal Rights Amendment, but modern academic authorities, liberals, even radical feminists. This analysis examines popular claims that modern American girls and young women are more troubled, mean, violent, criminal, narcissistic, addicted, materialistic, and otherwise disturbed, concluding that authors and other critics are scapegoating girls to avoid facing the implications of their own personal and older-generation crises.

 

Everyone concedes girls’ remarkable advances into larger society over the last generation, as indicated for education in Table 1. While, in their mothers’ generation and before, girls were more likely to drop out of school and fail to attend college than boys, the last 35 years has seen a dramatic reversal to the point that girls now dominate higher education. A majority of new lawyers and, within coming decades, a majority of physicians and other professionals will be women—can Congress and other seats of political power be far behind?

 

Table 1. Young women are taking over education, especially college

Percent age 16-24 who dropped out of high school*

 

Percent age 18-24 in college

Year:

Male

Female

 

Male

Female

1970

14.1%

15.0%

 

30.5%

21.9%

1980

14.7%

12.8%

 

25.2%

25.1%

1990

12.0%

11.2%

 

29.0%

30.6%

2000

11.8%

9.1%

 

31.0%

37.6%

2004

11.6%

9.0%

 

31.5%

40.8%

*Dropouts are 16- to 24-year-olds who are not enrolled in school and who have not completed a high school program regardless of when they left school.

Source: Digest of Education Statistics, 2005, Tables 105, 172.

 

However, from left to right, feminist to traditionalist, fearful cries echo that the rapid advance of girls and young women in American education, employment, independence, and cultural influence has a “dark side.” Sure, the ascendance of young women is beneficial, critics briefly concede… before launching book- and video-long manifestos about how girls’ success combined with misogynist media imagery has also spawned rising violence, materialism, body image disorders, eating disorders, depression, suicide, “hooking up,” binge drinking, drug abuse, destructive competition, even gun violence. These culture critics—right-wing, moderate, and progressive alike—paint modern girls very much like that of fundamentalist preachers battling women’s suffrage a century ago: young females are flighty, shallow, and fragile, temperamentally unequipped to handle the stresses of liberation and vulgar influences, reversing decades of feminist progress.

 

The troubling reality is exactly the opposite: middle-aged women of 1960s and ‘70s vintage, more than any previous generation, are caught up in a wave of drug abuse, crime, family instability, obesity and other body image crises, wealth concentration and materialism, and moralistic, reactionary political attitudes, as we’ll see in measure after measure. In most of the above devolutions, middle-aged men are even worse. In fact, girls and young women face ferocious attack today to shield older generations from facing their own failings.

 

Table 2. Young women getting safer, middle-aged women now most at risk

Female violent deaths/100,000 population

Age group

1980

2004

 

Change, 2004 vs. 1980

10-14

10.9

7.2

 

- 34%

15-19

36.4

27.5

 

- 25%

20-24

39.3

27.5

 

- 30%

25-29

34.2

25.3

 

- 26%

30-39

30.8

28.7

 

-  7%

40-49

33.5

38.7

 

+16%

50-59

34.9

31.5

 

- 10%

60-69

39.8

30.6

 

- 23%

Sources: WISQARS, National Center for Health Statistics, 1970-2004

 

Am I unfair to call many of today’ authors and commentators girlphobes? Listen to their own descriptions of girls: “Confused,” “insecure,” “lashing out,” “totally obnoxious,” “moody,” “cruel,” “sneaky,” characterized by “competition with” and “judgment of each other,” ruled by “social hierarchies” that are “painfully reinforced,” “lying,” “mean,” “exclusive,” and “catty”—those are the words Rachel Wiseman (who claims to like girls) applies them in the first 15 pages of Girl Wars.

 

Mary Pipher is just as negative: girls are characterized by “eating disorders, school phobias, self-inflicted injuries… great unhappiness… anxiety… a total focus on looks.” They are “moody, demanding, and distant… elusive… easily offended… slow to trust… sullen and secretive… depressed… overwhelmed… symptomatic… anorexic… alcoholic… in a dangerous place… traumatized,” “bristle when touched,” “saplings in a hurricane”—and we’re not even halfway through the first chapter of Reviving Ophelia.

 

The “I’m disordered, you’re disordered” authors balloon individual troubles into generation-wide mass pathology. “The sheer volume of celebrity illegality, and the specifically female faces behind the mug shots, is indicative of the new normalcy of addiction for young women—of all classes, cultures, and locales—in this country,” Courtney Martin writes in Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters. The woes of a few pop stars, herself, and her acquaintances and some mangled, secondhand statistics form the evidence for her claims of “the dwindling state of young women's mental health” and that “we are more diseased and more addicted than any generation of young women that has come before… succumbing to dangerous emotional numbs—eating disorders, binge drinking, and even harder drugs.”

 

Authors repeatedly project their own miseries and dismal attitudes on those of all girls. “Many of us hated our adolescent years,” Pipher says of growing up in the 1960s, “yet for the most part we weren’t suicidal and we didn’t develop eating disorders, cut ourselves, or run away from home.” Like other authors, Pipher’s negative attitude toward girls stems from her own troubles: (a) she “hated” her own adolescence (which a large majority of girls don’t); (b) she doesn’t “remember” girls having big problems in her youth (actually, girls had far worse problems 35 years ago than today); and (c) the girls she “sees in her practice” are messed up (which is not true of girls who aren’t seeing psychologists). These authors seem to think their heads contain the sum of the universe.

 

Not only do girlphobes bury real-life stresses affecting girls—led by severe poverty, violent and abusive families, and coping with their parents’ rising drug abuse and disarray—under an avalanche of yuppie frettings over fictional cultural images, many play on stereotypes of girls that were never true. That some girls (and women, though women are rarely mentioned) can be mean, violent, catty, self-destructive, cliquish, and aggressive is not an invention of the modern era, but has been the case throughout history. (“The girl of 14 is the problem of today,” read a Boston Sunday newspaper headline in 1925, one of many berating the supposedly rampant drinking, delinquency, and “freedom of intercourse” among 1920s girls.) In fact, while their moms and dads have suffered skyrocketing crises in the modern era, girls are doing better than ever.

 

Thank god for our culture’s future that girls as a generation in no way resemble the vicious, joyless cabal depicted by the Piphers, Wisemans, Martins, and other authors who misappropriate girls’ voices to their own dismal agendas. While these authors repeatedly invoke the editorial “we” (when claiming entitlement to speak for) and “they” (when claiming entitlement to characterize) all girls, they no more represent an entire gender and generation that a Kissinger or Chomsky could claim to speak for all Jews, or all men.

 

What, then, are authentic girls’ voices? To locate them, we have to move beyond the misery ideologues such as Pipher and Martin, as well as those who might be Pollyanna ideologues, such as me. Were I to base a book on my interviews and work with girls and young women as students, coworkers, and in programs, my positive experiences with them as generally happy, optimistic, responsible, and capable might lead to downplaying problems. Adult opinions of youth are notoriously suspect.

 

The best shot at understanding girls as a generation lies in combining the long-term, consistent surveys compiled by non-ideological sources with health outcome measures that reveal whether girls’ self-expressed attitudes are reflected in real-world behaviors. The gist of these measures shows that, yes, issues such as body image concerns, disorders, depression, violence, difficult relationships with men and each other, and other ills are problems, as they have been for eons. But, far from shattering a generation, today’s girls and young women are handling their problems better than past generations as they move into increasingly powerful and prominent roles. Contrary to the crusade against girls that has built to panicked levels in books and the press, there is little evidence that girls are any more criminal, materialistic, sick, mean, or threatened than they ever were—and a lot of evidence that they’re less so.

 

Worse than the fragile-troubled-girl fretters are the violent-criminal-girl mythmakers. “Today, more girls are entering the juvenile justice system because they have committed a violent crime, and they are doing so at younger ages,” announce Harvard University’s Deborah Prothrow-Stith and Howard Spivak in Sugar and Spice and No Longer Nice. “As guns become more permissible and available to girls, that will unleash more aggression in them... this may already be happening” James Garbarino adds in See Jane Hit. The press is endlessly worshipful of this malarkey—CBS News and other outlets breathlessly recycle years-old footage of girl scuffles and manufacture endless girl crises—no matter how evidence-light and silly. Prothrow-Stith and Spivak blame “Lara Croft, Tomb Raider” and “Kill Bill” for spurring ever-more traumatized girls to “engage in more violent behavior for fun or status or power.” Garbarino cites Harry Potter’s Hermione and Powerpuff Girls. As we’ll see, this is truly dumb stuff, a quest for easy scapegoats that reflects America’s ongoing trivialization of serious violence.

 

Any notion that the vast majority of America’s young women are healthy, sane, happy, and enjoying unprecedented successes in education and jobs are a threat to the grim ideologies of culture warriors on the left and right. Culture warriors translate their deep moral offense at what they see as sleazy, gory, materialistic trends in mass media and popular culture into a crusading imperative founded in the dogma that children and adolescents (especially girls, who many of them see as weak and vulnerable) must be more screwed up than ever.

 

 

Myth #1: Girls today are more depressed, alienated, fearful, mean, and materialistic.

 

Older generations’ self-flatteries and self-interests aside, how would we know whether girls are more pathological today? It’s hard to characterize what 20 million people are thinking. The best and long-term surveys of teens, Monitoring the Future and The American Freshman, have asked consistent questions of large samples of thousands of girls for several decades without ideological purpose. We can first see trends in what girls say about themselves, then compare their self reports to real-life measures of crime, violent deaths, and other measures to see if attitudes reflect behaviors. However flawed these measures might be, they are far superior to the biased memories, biased selections of girls to profile, and ideological appropriations of the girlphobe authors.

 

“Why are girls having more trouble now than my friends and I had when we were adolescents?” Pipher asks, claiming that girls of her generation were happier and more connected. But is this true? As Table 3 shows, teenaged girls in the first Monitoring the Future survey (1975) were slightly less happy with themselves and their lives, less satisfied with peers and parents, and less civic minded.

 

Table 3. But don’t girls say they’re more depressed,

scared, peer-tortured, alienated, and selfish today? NO!

Percentages of high school senior females telling Monitoring the Future:

Question:

1975-77

1980

1990

2000

2005

Happiness

    I’m “very happy”

21%

18%

18%

23%

23%

    Satisfied with life as a whole

63%

66%

65%

64%

66%

    Having fun

64%

67%

68%

65%

66%

    Enjoys fast pace and changes of today’s world

45%

42%

58%

56%

50%

    Daily participation in active sports/excercising

36%

38%

34%

35%

36%

Are you satisfied with (percent agreeing)…

    Yourself?

66%

71%

69%

71%

70%

    Your friends?

85%

85%

87%

83%

86%

    Your parents?

65%

69%

65%

68%

67%

    Your material possessions?

75%

75%

71%

73%

75%

    Your personal safety?

68%

67%

66%

69%

71%

    Your education?

56%

64%

64%

64%

70%

    Your job?

56%

54%

60%

56%

60%

    Feels “I can do things as well as most people”

89%

92%

89%

89%

87%

Values (percent agreeing)

    Important to be a leader in my community

19%

20%

33%

40%

46%

    Important to make a contribution to society

55%

52%

62%

65%

70%

    Important to have latest music, etc. fashions

77%

78%

70%

59%

51%

    Important to have latest-style clothes

42%

47%

57%

42%

39%

    Wants to have lots of money

35%

41%

63%

57%

59%

    Wants job with status and prestige

52%

60%

69%

65%

67%

    Wants job which provides lots of money

84%

89%

86%

86%

86%

    Wants job with opportunity to help others

92%

91%

92%

88%

90%

    Women should have equal job opportunity

82%

88%

96%

97%

95%

    Wants to correct social/economic inequality

37%

35%

44%

39%

39%

Depression/pessimism

    Dissatisfied with self

12%

10%

13%

10%

12%

    Sometimes thinks “I am no good at all”

28%

27%

28%

25%

24%

    I’m “not too happy”

13%

17%

12%

14%

13%

    Feels I am “not a person of worth”

5%

5%

6%

7%

8%

    Often feels “left out of things”

33%

34%

36%

34%

29%

    Feels there’s usually no one I can talk to

6%

5%

6%

6%

5%

    Feels “I can’t do anything right”

10%

11%

12%

14%

14%

    Wishes “I had more good friends”

50%

46%

50%

52%

44%

    Not having fun

19%

13%

16%

20%

17%

    Can’t get ahead because others stop me

22%

21%

26%

26%

20%

    Thinks “things change too quickly” today

54%

56%

44%

44%

46%

    Thinks “times ahead of me will be tougher”

47%

54%

45%

42%

41%

    Feels “people like me don’t have a chance”

6%

5%

5%

5%

5%

*Source: Monitoring the Future,1975-2005.

 

Compared to girls of past decades, girls today are somewhat happier, less likely to feel no good, less likely to feel left out or in need of more friends, happier with a fast-changing society, much happier with school and jobs, feeling safer, and more optimistic about the future. They are more likely to value leadership, being financially well off, and contributing positively to society. While the percentage of unhappy girls has stayed about the same when various measures are combined, those reporting more optimistic, healthier attitudes are reflected in the increasing numbers who graduate and go to college.

 

Here, the University of California, Los Angeles’s, Higher Education Research Institute has surveyed hundreds of thousands of first-year students for The American Freshman, finding girls’ rates of depression have fallen sharply and steadily from their peak 20 years ago (Table 4). However, the percentage “feeling overwhelmed by all I have to do” rose to the late 1990s and leveled off. Part of this may be due to the fact that college women are extending their education at the same time their student loan debts are rising and more are working while going to school—trends forced on them by declining public funding of higher education.

 

Table 4. Percent of first-year college women saying they feel:

Years

Frequently depressed

Overwhelmed by all I have to do

1985-89

11.4%

25.8%

1990-94

11.0%

30.9%

1995-99

10.4%

37.7%

2000-04